Kita Ward, Okayama City Housing Market Report 2025
Data updated 2026-11-10 · Source: MLIT transaction price survey, 2005 Q3–2026 Q2
Key figures for 2025
- Median used condo price
- ¥24.0M
- ¥338k/m²
- Median house price (land + building)
- ¥24.0M
- -19.6% vs 2024
- Residential land per m² (sales)
- ¥88k/m²
- +20.5% over 5 years
- Transactions in 2025
- 617
- #1 of 14 areas in Okayama by price per m²
What the data says
Prices are still rising, but more slowly
Growth has cooled to about 3.9% a year, down from 5.8% a year in the previous five years. This looks more like a maturing market than a turning point, and it gives buyers a bit more room to negotiate.
Outperforming Okayama
Per m², condos here are 15% above the Okayama average. The premium has grown from 0% ten years ago, so Kita Ward, Okayama City has been outperforming its surroundings.
Station distance barely matters
Condos 11–15 minutes from a station sell for similar or higher prices than those near one, which usually means buyers here drive or value quiet residential streets.
A family market
63% of recent condo sales have three or more bedrooms. Demand comes mainly from owner-occupier families, which tends to make prices steadier but rental yields lower.
What a typical purchase costs
Half of all condo sales last year were between ¥12.0M and ¥33.0M. Listings outside that range are either unusual properties or worth a closer look.
A shrinking population
The population fell 1.1% between 2020 and 2025 (−4.2% for the wider area). More people moved out than in during 2025 (about 4.1 per 1,000 residents), which weakens long-term housing demand. Households still grew 2.8% as people live in smaller households, which supports demand for smaller homes even as the population shrinks.
Typical vacancy
15.3% of homes were empty in 2023 (16.4% for the wider area), and 5.5% were empty without being for rent, for sale or used as second homes. The level of abandoned homes is around the national norm.
Buying vs renting
A median used condo costs about 37.8 years of the area's median rent (¥53k a month), compared with 35.2 years for the wider area. Prices are high relative to rents, so rental yields are thin and buyers are paying for expected growth. Rents here cover all rented homes, so treat this as a rough guide.
Moderate earthquake risk
The government's seismic model gives a 46% chance of shaking of intensity 6-lower or stronger in the next 30 years (34% for the wider area). Post-1981 buildings are designed for this level of shaking, but check ground conditions and insurance.
Official land prices are edging up
On the government's fixed benchmark sites, which are valued the same way every year, residential land prices changed +3% in the year to January 2026 and +11% over five years. They are still 36% below their 1991 bubble-era level. Because these sites don't change, this is the cleanest measure of land value trends.
Significant flood risk
Of the official land-price benchmark sites here, which sit in typical neighbourhoods, 95% are inside the worst-case flood zone (29% with expected depths of 3 m or more). Most worst-case flood zones are shallow (under 0.5 m) at the edges, so depth matters as much as the share. Check the hazard map for any specific address before buying.
Government-backed redevelopment
This area includes national Urgent Urban Renewal Areas: Okayama Station and Omotecho. These allow larger, denser buildings and give big projects financial support, so expect new offices, shops and housing to keep reshaping the area.
Living in Kita Ward, Okayama City: people, homes and risks
- Population 2025
- 311,192
- -1.1% since 2020
- Okayama: -4.2%
- Net moves in 2025
- -1,281
- -4.12 per 1,000 residents
- Okayama: -3.09
- Vacant homes (2023)
- 15.3%
- 5.5% empty and not for rent or sale
- Okayama: 16.4%
- Median rent (2023)
- ¥53k
- per month, all rented homes
- Okayama: ¥50k
- Strong earthquake risk
- 45.7%
- chance of shaking of intensity 6-lower or more within 30 years
- Okayama: 33.5%
- Official land price 2026
- ¥81k/m²
- +2.5% in a year · +11.1% in 5 years
- Okayama: ¥37k/m²
- Flood exposure
- 95.4%
- of 65 benchmark sites in a worst-case flood zone (29.2% 3 m or deeper)
- Okayama: 69.1%
- Tsunami exposure
- 1.5%
- of 65 benchmark sites in a tsunami inundation zone
- Okayama: 13.7%
- Landslide exposure
- 0.0%
- of 65 benchmark sites in a landslide warning area
- Okayama: 5.8%
Urban renewal zones
Areas designated by the national government for priority redevelopment, with relaxed planning rules and financial support for large projects.
- Okayama Station and Omotecho · 113 ha · designated 2003
Check flood, landslide and tsunami zones for a specific address on the government hazard map ↗
Sources: 2025 Census (preliminary), 2025 Internal Migration Report, 2023 Housing and Land Survey (Statistics Bureau of Japan); J-SHIS seismic hazard model (NIED, 2024); Land Price Publication (MLIT). Earthquake probability is measured at the municipal center.
Example sales in Kita Ward, Okayama City
Real transactions from the last four quarters, picked near the lower (20th percentile), middle and upper (80th percentile) price points. Locations are shown at district level, as published by MLIT.
Condo
¥10.0M
¥154k/m²
- Daiku
- Okayama · 18 min walk
- 2LDK · 65 m²
- Built 1986 (39 yrs) · SRC
¥24.0M
¥400k/m²
- Seikibashi
- Okayama · 24 min walk
- 2LDK · 60 m²
- Built 2009 (17 yrs) · RC
¥37.0M
¥493k/m²
- Hokancho
- Okayama · 7 min walk
- 3LDK · 75 m²
- Built 2003 (23 yrs) · SRC
House
¥13.0M
¥144k/m²
- Yamatomachi
- Hokaiin · 13 min walk
- Land 180 m² · floor 90 m²
- Built 1959 (66 yrs) · Wood
¥30.0M
¥286k/m²
- Hirano
- Niwase · 9 min walk
- Land 140 m² · floor 105 m²
- Built 2026 (0 yrs) · Wood
¥73.0M
¥317k/m²
- Omoto
- Omoto(Okayama) · 16 min walk
- Land 270 m² · floor 230 m²
- Built 1988 (37 yrs) · Steel
Show data table
| Year | Condo | House |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | ¥13.0M | ¥23.5M |
| 2008 | ¥17.5M | ¥25.0M |
| 2009 | ¥13.0M | ¥23.0M |
| 2010 | ¥13.0M | ¥25.0M |
| 2011 | ¥11.5M | ¥27.0M |
| 2012 | ¥14.0M | ¥25.5M |
| 2013 | ¥12.0M | ¥25.0M |
| 2014 | ¥14.0M | ¥24.0M |
| 2015 | ¥15.0M | ¥25.5M |
| 2016 | ¥14.0M | ¥27.0M |
| 2017 | ¥15.5M | ¥27.0M |
| 2018 | ¥18.0M | ¥27.0M |
| 2019 | ¥18.0M | ¥29.0M |
| 2020 | ¥20.0M | ¥28.0M |
| 2021 | ¥17.0M | ¥30.0M |
| 2022 | ¥20.0M | ¥27.0M |
| 2023 | ¥25.0M | ¥29.0M |
| 2024 | ¥22.5M | ¥33.0M |
| 2025 | ¥24.0M | ¥24.0M |
| 2026 (partial) | ¥25.5M | ¥31.5M |
Show data table
| Year | Condo | House | Land |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | ¥186k/m² | ¥155k/m² | ¥63k/m² |
| 2008 | ¥231k/m² | ¥146k/m² | ¥60k/m² |
| 2009 | ¥200k/m² | ¥140k/m² | ¥61k/m² |
| 2010 | ¥185k/m² | ¥143k/m² | ¥60k/m² |
| 2011 | ¥177k/m² | ¥150k/m² | ¥45k/m² |
| 2012 | ¥200k/m² | ¥140k/m² | ¥63k/m² |
| 2013 | ¥185k/m² | ¥152k/m² | ¥60k/m² |
| 2014 | ¥200k/m² | ¥160k/m² | ¥55k/m² |
| 2015 | ¥214k/m² | ¥155k/m² | ¥54k/m² |
| 2016 | ¥212k/m² | ¥164k/m² | ¥65k/m² |
| 2017 | ¥231k/m² | ¥173k/m² | ¥76k/m² |
| 2018 | ¥277k/m² | ¥183k/m² | ¥68k/m² |
| 2019 | ¥266k/m² | ¥170k/m² | ¥74k/m² |
| 2020 | ¥284k/m² | ¥170k/m² | ¥73k/m² |
| 2021 | ¥255k/m² | ¥200k/m² | ¥86k/m² |
| 2022 | ¥300k/m² | ¥190k/m² | ¥83k/m² |
| 2023 | ¥347k/m² | ¥190k/m² | ¥84k/m² |
| 2024 | ¥327k/m² | ¥216k/m² | ¥71k/m² |
| 2025 | ¥338k/m² | ¥174k/m² | ¥88k/m² |
| 2026 (partial) | ¥381k/m² | ¥213k/m² | ¥97k/m² |
Show data table
| Building age (years) | Condo | House |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | – | ¥362k/m² |
| 1 | – | ¥333k/m² |
| 2 | ¥615k/m² | ¥370k/m² |
| 3 | ¥538k/m² | – |
| 4 | ¥514k/m² | – |
| 5 | ¥519k/m² | – |
| 6 | ¥446k/m² | – |
| 8 | ¥427k/m² | ¥313k/m² |
| 9 | ¥425k/m² | – |
| 10 | ¥427k/m² | – |
| 11 | ¥388k/m² | – |
| 12 | ¥394k/m² | – |
| 13 | ¥412k/m² | – |
| 14 | ¥398k/m² | – |
| 15 | ¥383k/m² | – |
| 16 | ¥450k/m² | ¥246k/m² |
| 17 | ¥384k/m² | ¥181k/m² |
| 18 | ¥350k/m² | – |
| 19 | ¥384k/m² | ¥280k/m² |
| 20 | ¥328k/m² | – |
| 21 | ¥320k/m² | – |
| 22 | ¥328k/m² | ¥220k/m² |
| 23 | ¥300k/m² | ¥213k/m² |
| 24 | ¥300k/m² | ¥171k/m² |
| 25 | ¥269k/m² | ¥165k/m² |
| 26 | – | ¥166k/m² |
| 27 | ¥257k/m² | ¥129k/m² |
| 28 | ¥256k/m² | ¥142k/m² |
| 29 | ¥214k/m² | ¥145k/m² |
| 30 | ¥185k/m² | ¥186k/m² |
| 31 | ¥165k/m² | ¥100k/m² |
| 32 | ¥180k/m² | ¥162k/m² |
| 33 | ¥182k/m² | ¥132k/m² |
| 34 | ¥173k/m² | ¥164k/m² |
| 35 | ¥150k/m² | ¥115k/m² |
| 36 | ¥157k/m² | ¥145k/m² |
| 37 | – | ¥138k/m² |
| 38 | – | ¥112k/m² |
| 39 | – | ¥120k/m² |
| 40 | – | ¥129k/m² |
| 41 | – | ¥188k/m² |
| 42 | – | ¥120k/m² |
| 43 | – | ¥129k/m² |
| 44 | – | ¥140k/m² |
| 45 | – | ¥96k/m² |
| 46 | – | ¥71k/m² |
| 47 | – | ¥126k/m² |
| 48 | – | ¥129k/m² |
| 49 | – | ¥96k/m² |
| 50 | ¥67k/m² | ¥110k/m² |
Each line follows buildings from one construction period over time. 1981 is when Japan's current earthquake-resistance standard (shin-taishin) took effect.
Show data table
| Year | 1981-2000 | 2001-2010 | 2011-2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | ¥180k/m² | – | – |
| 2008 | ¥185k/m² | ¥300k/m² | – |
| 2009 | ¥160k/m² | ¥271k/m² | – |
| 2010 | ¥163k/m² | ¥308k/m² | – |
| 2011 | ¥154k/m² | – | – |
| 2012 | ¥143k/m² | ¥300k/m² | – |
| 2013 | ¥137k/m² | ¥300k/m² | – |
| 2014 | ¥150k/m² | ¥308k/m² | – |
| 2015 | ¥165k/m² | ¥300k/m² | – |
| 2016 | ¥169k/m² | ¥321k/m² | – |
| 2017 | ¥171k/m² | ¥313k/m² | – |
| 2018 | ¥186k/m² | ¥329k/m² | – |
| 2019 | ¥172k/m² | ¥329k/m² | – |
| 2020 | ¥183k/m² | ¥339k/m² | ¥387k/m² |
| 2021 | ¥184k/m² | ¥344k/m² | – |
| 2022 | ¥200k/m² | ¥369k/m² | ¥462k/m² |
| 2023 | ¥213k/m² | ¥349k/m² | ¥485k/m² |
| 2024 | ¥183k/m² | ¥373k/m² | ¥448k/m² |
| 2025 | ¥208k/m² | ¥393k/m² | ¥463k/m² |
Each line follows buildings from one construction period over time. 1981 is when Japan's current earthquake-resistance standard (shin-taishin) took effect.
Show data table
| Year | 1971-1980 | 1981-2000 | 2001-2010 | 2011-2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | ¥101k/m² | ¥159k/m² | ¥317k/m² | – |
| 2008 | ¥104k/m² | ¥139k/m² | ¥289k/m² | – |
| 2009 | ¥106k/m² | ¥138k/m² | ¥277k/m² | – |
| 2010 | ¥110k/m² | ¥135k/m² | ¥260k/m² | – |
| 2011 | ¥109k/m² | ¥138k/m² | – | ¥314k/m² |
| 2012 | ¥100k/m² | ¥128k/m² | – | ¥308k/m² |
| 2013 | ¥105k/m² | ¥133k/m² | – | ¥320k/m² |
| 2014 | ¥100k/m² | ¥150k/m² | – | ¥333k/m² |
| 2015 | ¥92k/m² | ¥122k/m² | – | ¥309k/m² |
| 2016 | ¥113k/m² | ¥157k/m² | – | ¥296k/m² |
| 2017 | ¥94k/m² | ¥144k/m² | ¥180k/m² | ¥324k/m² |
| 2018 | ¥118k/m² | ¥131k/m² | – | ¥340k/m² |
| 2019 | ¥90k/m² | ¥142k/m² | – | ¥351k/m² |
| 2020 | ¥89k/m² | ¥144k/m² | – | ¥350k/m² |
| 2021 | ¥103k/m² | ¥140k/m² | – | – |
| 2022 | ¥117k/m² | ¥130k/m² | – | – |
| 2023 | ¥133k/m² | ¥140k/m² | – | – |
| 2024 | ¥83k/m² | ¥146k/m² | – | – |
| 2025 | ¥97k/m² | ¥153k/m² | ¥200k/m² | ¥349k/m² |
| 2026 (partial) | – | ¥131k/m² | – | – |
Prices near train stations in Kita Ward, Okayama City
Sales from 2023–2025, grouped by nearest station.
| Station | Median used condo price | Condo price per m² | Median house price (land + building) | Walk (min) | Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Okayama (岡山) | ¥26.0M | ¥400k/m² | ¥35.0M | 13 | 442 |
| Omoto(Okayama) (大元) | ¥21.0M | ¥313k/m² | ¥58.0M | 11 | 206 |
| Hokaiin (法界院) | ¥23.0M | ¥317k/m² | ¥34.0M | 11 | 82 |
| Niwase (庭瀬) | – | – | ¥25.0M | 16 | 82 |
| Kitanagase (北長瀬) | ¥29.0M | ¥377k/m² | ¥40.5M | 18 | 66 |
| Bizen Ichinomiya (備前一宮) | – | – | ¥19.0M | 18 | 45 |
| Bizen Mikado (備前三門) | – | – | ¥20.0M | 10 | 43 |
| Bitchu Takamatsu (備中高松) | – | – | ¥5.7M | 16 | 28 |
| Daianji (大安寺) | – | – | ¥35.0M | 13 | 24 |
| Tamagashi (玉柏) | – | – | ¥14.0M | 25 | 17 |
| Bizen Nishiichi (備前西市) | – | – | ¥49.5M | 16 | 17 |
| Bizen Hara (備前原) | – | – | ¥13.0M | 13 | 15 |
| Ashimori (足守) | – | – | ¥12.5M | 16 | 14 |
| Kibitsu (吉備津) | – | – | ¥21.0M | 11 | 13 |
| Kanagawa(Okayama) (金川) | – | – | ¥9.0M | 20 | 12 |
Used condo prices by layout in Kita Ward, Okayama City
Sales from 2023–2025.
| Layout | Median used condo price | Typical size | Sales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3LDK | ¥27.0M | 70 m² | 191 |
| 2LDK | ¥24.0M | 65 m² | 78 |
| 4LDK | ¥30.0M | 85 m² | 43 |
| 1K | ¥3.3M | 20 m² | 28 |
| 1LDK | ¥21.5M | 55 m² | 10 |
How much does an apartment cost in Kita Ward, Okayama City?
The median used condo (mansion) in Kita Ward, Okayama City sold for ¥24.0M in 2025, about ¥338k/m², based on 125 recorded sales.
How much does a house cost in Kita Ward, Okayama City?
The median house sale, including the land, was ¥24.0M in 2025 across 259 sales.
Are property prices in Kita Ward, Okayama City going up?
Over the five years to 2025, condo prices per m² changed +19.2% and residential land prices changed +20.5%.
About this data
Figures are medians of real transactions reported to Japan's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) through its quarterly price survey. House prices per m² divide the total price (land and building) by the floor area. Medians based on fewer than 20 sales are not shown. The latest quarters are preliminary and are revised as more survey responses arrive.
Information only, not investment advice.