Kagoshima City Housing Market Report 2025
Data updated 2026-11-10 · Source: MLIT transaction price survey, 2005 Q3–2026 Q2
Key figures for 2025
- Median used condo price
- ¥22.0M
- ¥290k/m²
- Median house price (land + building)
- ¥25.0M
- -4.3% vs 2024
- Residential land per m² (sales)
- ¥78k/m²
- +30.0% over 5 years
- Transactions in 2025
- 1,065
- #1 of 13 areas in Kagoshima by price per m²
What the data says
Prices are still rising, but more slowly
Growth has cooled to about 1.3% a year, down from 3.8% a year in the previous five years. This looks more like a maturing market than a turning point, and it gives buyers a bit more room to negotiate.
Moving with Kagoshima
Per m², condos here are priced close to the Kagoshima average. That position has barely changed in ten years, so it moves with the wider market.
Being near a station is worth a lot
Condos within a 5-minute walk of a station sell for about 25% more per m² than those 11–15 minutes away. If budget is tight, a longer walk is the quickest way to cut the price.
A family market
62% of recent condo sales have three or more bedrooms. Demand comes mainly from owner-occupier families, which tends to make prices steadier but rental yields lower.
Sales are thinning out
Transactions are down about 14% on the previous three years. Fewer sales mean less choice and slower resale, so allow more time to sell later.
What a typical purchase costs
Half of all condo sales last year were between ¥7.5M and ¥30.0M. Listings outside that range are either unusual properties or worth a closer look.
A shrinking population
The population fell 2% between 2020 and 2025 (−4.7% for the wider area). Moves in and out roughly balanced in 2025. Households still grew 1.8% as people live in smaller households, which supports demand for smaller homes even as the population shrinks.
Typical vacancy
15.3% of homes were empty in 2023 (20.5% for the wider area), and 7.4% were empty without being for rent, for sale or used as second homes. The level of abandoned homes is around the national norm.
Buying vs renting
A median used condo costs about 38 years of the area's median rent (¥48k a month), compared with 43.2 years for the wider area. Prices are high relative to rents, so rental yields are thin and buyers are paying for expected growth. Rents here cover all rented homes, so treat this as a rough guide.
Lower earthquake risk
The government's seismic model gives a 18% chance of shaking of intensity 6-lower or stronger in the next 30 years (16% for the wider area). This is low by Japanese standards, although no part of Japan is free of earthquake risk.
Official land prices are edging up
On the government's fixed benchmark sites, which are valued the same way every year, residential land prices changed +1% in the year to January 2026 and +3% over five years. Because these sites don't change, this is the cleanest measure of land value trends.
Some flood or landslide exposure
Of the official land-price benchmark sites here, which sit in typical neighbourhoods, 44% are inside the worst-case flood zone (9% with expected depths of 3 m or more). Most worst-case flood zones are shallow (under 0.5 m) at the edges, so depth matters as much as the share. Check the hazard map for any specific address before buying.
Living in Kagoshima City: people, homes and risks
- Population 2025
- 580,970
- -2.0% since 2020
- Kagoshima: -4.7%
- Net moves in 2025
- -1,146
- -1.97 per 1,000 residents
- Kagoshima: -3.31
- Vacant homes (2023)
- 15.3%
- 7.4% empty and not for rent or sale
- Kagoshima: 20.5%
- Median rent (2023)
- ¥48k
- per month, all rented homes
- Kagoshima: ¥42k
- Strong earthquake risk
- 17.9%
- chance of shaking of intensity 6-lower or more within 30 years
- Kagoshima: 15.6%
- Official land price 2026
- ¥81k/m²
- +0.8% in a year · +3.0% in 5 years
- Kagoshima: ¥19k/m²
- Flood exposure
- 43.6%
- of 101 benchmark sites in a worst-case flood zone (8.9% 3 m or deeper)
- Kagoshima: 27.0%
- Landslide exposure
- 3.0%
- of 101 benchmark sites in a landslide warning area
- Kagoshima: 4.6%
Check flood, landslide and tsunami zones for a specific address on the government hazard map ↗
Sources: 2025 Census (preliminary), 2025 Internal Migration Report, 2023 Housing and Land Survey (Statistics Bureau of Japan); J-SHIS seismic hazard model (NIED, 2024); Land Price Publication (MLIT). Earthquake probability is measured at the municipal center.
Example sales in Kagoshima City
Real transactions from the last four quarters, picked near the lower (20th percentile), middle and upper (80th percentile) price points. Locations are shown at district level, as published by MLIT.
Condo
¥6.4M
¥98k/m²
- Kamoikeshimmachi
- Minami Kagoshima · 18 min walk
- 3LDK · 65 m²
- Built 1977 (48 yrs) · SRC
¥24.0M
¥267k/m²
- Take
- Kagoshima Chuo · 8 min walk
- 4LDK · 90 m²
- Built 1996 (30 yrs) · SRC
¥31.0M
¥443k/m²
- Uearatacho
- Kagoshima Chuo · 14 min walk
- 3LDK · 70 m²
- Built 2003 (23 yrs) · SRC
House
¥8.2M
¥50k/m²
- Harara
- Kagoshima Chuo
- Land 170 m² · floor 165 m²
- Built 1994 (31 yrs) · Wood
¥25.0M
¥89k/m²
- Arata
- Kagoshima Chuo · 23 min walk
- Land 145 m² · floor 280 m²
- Built 1984 (42 yrs) · RC
¥44.0M
¥119k/m²
- Kamoike
- Kagoshima Chuo
- Land 170 m² · floor 370 m²
- Built 1988 (38 yrs) · RC
Show data table
| Year | Condo | House |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | ¥16.0M | ¥22.0M |
| 2008 | ¥16.0M | ¥21.0M |
| 2009 | ¥16.0M | ¥19.0M |
| 2010 | ¥19.0M | ¥22.0M |
| 2011 | ¥18.0M | ¥21.0M |
| 2012 | ¥16.0M | ¥22.0M |
| 2013 | ¥16.0M | ¥20.0M |
| 2014 | ¥16.0M | ¥20.0M |
| 2015 | ¥17.0M | ¥23.0M |
| 2016 | ¥16.0M | ¥23.0M |
| 2017 | ¥18.0M | ¥23.0M |
| 2018 | ¥17.0M | ¥24.0M |
| 2019 | ¥19.0M | ¥25.0M |
| 2020 | ¥21.0M | ¥24.0M |
| 2021 | ¥21.0M | ¥25.5M |
| 2022 | ¥17.0M | ¥22.0M |
| 2023 | ¥18.0M | ¥26.0M |
| 2024 | ¥22.0M | ¥26.0M |
| 2025 | ¥22.0M | ¥25.0M |
| 2026 (partial) | ¥26.0M | ¥25.0M |
Show data table
| Year | Condo | House | Land |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | ¥229k/m² | ¥175k/m² | ¥75k/m² |
| 2008 | ¥214k/m² | ¥175k/m² | ¥84k/m² |
| 2009 | ¥227k/m² | ¥153k/m² | ¥59k/m² |
| 2010 | ¥267k/m² | ¥160k/m² | ¥63k/m² |
| 2011 | ¥232k/m² | ¥153k/m² | ¥67k/m² |
| 2012 | ¥229k/m² | ¥176k/m² | ¥65k/m² |
| 2013 | ¥225k/m² | ¥170k/m² | ¥63k/m² |
| 2014 | ¥223k/m² | ¥156k/m² | ¥61k/m² |
| 2015 | ¥240k/m² | ¥176k/m² | ¥60k/m² |
| 2016 | ¥231k/m² | ¥188k/m² | ¥59k/m² |
| 2017 | ¥255k/m² | ¥189k/m² | ¥68k/m² |
| 2018 | ¥241k/m² | ¥200k/m² | ¥60k/m² |
| 2019 | ¥263k/m² | ¥210k/m² | ¥57k/m² |
| 2020 | ¥297k/m² | ¥222k/m² | ¥60k/m² |
| 2021 | ¥286k/m² | ¥193k/m² | ¥68k/m² |
| 2022 | ¥269k/m² | ¥176k/m² | ¥75k/m² |
| 2023 | ¥274k/m² | ¥192k/m² | ¥68k/m² |
| 2024 | ¥308k/m² | ¥189k/m² | ¥74k/m² |
| 2025 | ¥290k/m² | ¥180k/m² | ¥78k/m² |
| 2026 (partial) | ¥335k/m² | ¥158k/m² | ¥70k/m² |
Show data table
| Building age (years) | Condo | House |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | – | ¥320k/m² |
| 1 | – | ¥312k/m² |
| 2 | – | ¥338k/m² |
| 3 | – | ¥327k/m² |
| 4 | – | ¥289k/m² |
| 5 | ¥480k/m² | ¥300k/m² |
| 6 | ¥435k/m² | ¥309k/m² |
| 7 | ¥477k/m² | ¥275k/m² |
| 8 | – | ¥237k/m² |
| 9 | – | ¥314k/m² |
| 10 | ¥443k/m² | ¥260k/m² |
| 11 | – | ¥236k/m² |
| 12 | ¥381k/m² | ¥210k/m² |
| 13 | ¥389k/m² | ¥217k/m² |
| 14 | – | ¥200k/m² |
| 15 | ¥322k/m² | ¥237k/m² |
| 16 | ¥389k/m² | ¥194k/m² |
| 17 | ¥367k/m² | ¥200k/m² |
| 18 | ¥376k/m² | ¥200k/m² |
| 19 | ¥356k/m² | ¥198k/m² |
| 20 | ¥294k/m² | ¥181k/m² |
| 21 | ¥338k/m² | ¥188k/m² |
| 22 | ¥363k/m² | ¥147k/m² |
| 23 | ¥293k/m² | ¥163k/m² |
| 24 | ¥365k/m² | ¥148k/m² |
| 25 | ¥308k/m² | ¥160k/m² |
| 26 | – | ¥140k/m² |
| 27 | ¥260k/m² | ¥148k/m² |
| 28 | – | ¥150k/m² |
| 29 | – | ¥158k/m² |
| 30 | ¥214k/m² | ¥147k/m² |
| 31 | ¥171k/m² | ¥137k/m² |
| 32 | ¥187k/m² | ¥142k/m² |
| 33 | ¥160k/m² | ¥135k/m² |
| 34 | ¥173k/m² | ¥135k/m² |
| 35 | ¥123k/m² | ¥118k/m² |
| 36 | ¥147k/m² | ¥128k/m² |
| 37 | – | ¥108k/m² |
| 38 | ¥150k/m² | ¥114k/m² |
| 39 | – | ¥115k/m² |
| 40 | ¥185k/m² | ¥118k/m² |
| 41 | ¥175k/m² | ¥88k/m² |
| 42 | – | ¥89k/m² |
| 43 | – | ¥95k/m² |
| 44 | ¥165k/m² | ¥65k/m² |
| 45 | ¥143k/m² | ¥93k/m² |
| 46 | – | ¥92k/m² |
| 47 | ¥147k/m² | ¥104k/m² |
| 48 | – | ¥93k/m² |
| 49 | – | ¥97k/m² |
| 50 | – | ¥105k/m² |
Each line follows buildings from one construction period over time. 1981 is when Japan's current earthquake-resistance standard (shin-taishin) took effect.
Show data table
| Year | 1971-1980 | 1981-2000 | 2001-2010 | 2011-2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | – | ¥215k/m² | ¥316k/m² | – |
| 2008 | – | ¥200k/m² | ¥329k/m² | – |
| 2009 | – | ¥200k/m² | ¥320k/m² | – |
| 2010 | – | ¥188k/m² | ¥340k/m² | – |
| 2011 | – | ¥200k/m² | ¥325k/m² | – |
| 2012 | – | ¥193k/m² | ¥290k/m² | – |
| 2013 | – | ¥213k/m² | ¥308k/m² | – |
| 2014 | – | ¥178k/m² | ¥307k/m² | – |
| 2015 | – | ¥220k/m² | ¥316k/m² | – |
| 2016 | – | ¥206k/m² | ¥343k/m² | – |
| 2017 | ¥129k/m² | ¥215k/m² | ¥320k/m² | – |
| 2018 | ¥120k/m² | ¥210k/m² | ¥307k/m² | – |
| 2019 | – | ¥240k/m² | ¥327k/m² | – |
| 2020 | – | ¥185k/m² | ¥329k/m² | ¥500k/m² |
| 2021 | – | ¥229k/m² | ¥327k/m² | ¥438k/m² |
| 2022 | – | ¥200k/m² | ¥347k/m² | – |
| 2023 | – | ¥161k/m² | ¥382k/m² | ¥435k/m² |
| 2024 | – | ¥183k/m² | ¥360k/m² | ¥473k/m² |
| 2025 | – | ¥215k/m² | ¥375k/m² | – |
| 2026 (partial) | – | ¥229k/m² | – | – |
Each line follows buildings from one construction period over time. 1981 is when Japan's current earthquake-resistance standard (shin-taishin) took effect.
Show data table
| Year | 1971-1980 | 1981-2000 | 2001-2010 | 2011-2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | ¥136k/m² | ¥143k/m² | ¥250k/m² | – |
| 2008 | ¥138k/m² | ¥152k/m² | ¥257k/m² | – |
| 2009 | ¥119k/m² | ¥129k/m² | ¥259k/m² | – |
| 2010 | ¥123k/m² | ¥136k/m² | ¥256k/m² | – |
| 2011 | ¥102k/m² | ¥136k/m² | ¥211k/m² | ¥280k/m² |
| 2012 | ¥118k/m² | ¥131k/m² | ¥184k/m² | ¥263k/m² |
| 2013 | ¥113k/m² | ¥130k/m² | ¥190k/m² | ¥267k/m² |
| 2014 | ¥109k/m² | ¥133k/m² | ¥200k/m² | ¥250k/m² |
| 2015 | ¥102k/m² | ¥138k/m² | ¥196k/m² | ¥274k/m² |
| 2016 | ¥119k/m² | ¥142k/m² | ¥223k/m² | ¥267k/m² |
| 2017 | ¥111k/m² | ¥135k/m² | ¥194k/m² | ¥275k/m² |
| 2018 | ¥122k/m² | ¥142k/m² | ¥180k/m² | ¥279k/m² |
| 2019 | ¥99k/m² | ¥140k/m² | ¥207k/m² | ¥280k/m² |
| 2020 | ¥114k/m² | ¥129k/m² | ¥200k/m² | ¥282k/m² |
| 2021 | ¥81k/m² | ¥138k/m² | ¥183k/m² | ¥289k/m² |
| 2022 | ¥103k/m² | ¥137k/m² | ¥200k/m² | ¥280k/m² |
| 2023 | ¥96k/m² | ¥117k/m² | ¥208k/m² | ¥324k/m² |
| 2024 | ¥92k/m² | ¥125k/m² | ¥200k/m² | ¥244k/m² |
| 2025 | ¥94k/m² | ¥123k/m² | ¥189k/m² | ¥250k/m² |
| 2026 (partial) | ¥73k/m² | ¥130k/m² | – | – |
Prices near train stations in Kagoshima City
Sales from 2023–2025, grouped by nearest station.
| Station | Median used condo price | Condo price per m² | Median house price (land + building) | Walk (min) | Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kagoshima Chuo (鹿児島中央) | ¥22.0M | ¥312k/m² | ¥29.5M | 18 | 698 |
| Kagoshima (鹿児島) | ¥23.0M | ¥300k/m² | ¥19.0M | 13 | 365 |
| Taniyama(JR) (谷山(ＪＲ)) | ¥25.0M | ¥345k/m² | ¥31.5M | 14 | 160 |
| Usuki(Kagoshima) (宇宿) | ¥18.5M | ¥240k/m² | ¥30.0M | 13 | 159 |
| Hiroki (広木) | – | – | ¥17.0M | 23 | 116 |
| Minami Kagoshima (南鹿児島) | ¥15.0M | ¥183k/m² | ¥30.0M | 16 | 116 |
| Korimoto(JR) (郡元(ＪＲ)) | ¥28.0M | ¥375k/m² | ¥29.0M | 16 | 109 |
| Sakano Ue (坂之上) | – | – | ¥20.5M | 12 | 86 |
| Jigenji (慈眼寺) | – | – | ¥35.0M | 10 | 65 |
| Kami Ijuin (上伊集院) | – | – | ¥21.0M | 15 | 49 |
| Goino (五位野) | – | – | ¥20.0M | 12 | 21 |
| Kiire (喜入) | – | – | ¥14.0M | 9 | 15 |
Used condo prices by layout in Kagoshima City
Sales from 2023–2025.
| Layout | Median used condo price | Typical size | Sales |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3LDK | ¥25.0M | 70 m² | 204 |
| 4LDK | ¥26.0M | 85 m² | 62 |
| 1K | ¥2.5M | 20 m² | 61 |
| 2LDK | ¥25.0M | 60 m² | 57 |
| 2DK | ¥4.5M | 45 m² | 15 |
| 1LDK | ¥6.6M | 45 m² | 12 |
How much does an apartment cost in Kagoshima City?
The median used condo (mansion) in Kagoshima City sold for ¥22.0M in 2025, about ¥290k/m², based on 160 recorded sales.
How much does a house cost in Kagoshima City?
The median house sale, including the land, was ¥25.0M in 2025 across 494 sales.
Are property prices in Kagoshima City going up?
Over the five years to 2025, condo prices per m² changed -2.3% and residential land prices changed +30.0%.
About this data
Figures are medians of real transactions reported to Japan's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) through its quarterly price survey. House prices per m² divide the total price (land and building) by the floor area. Medians based on fewer than 20 sales are not shown. The latest quarters are preliminary and are revised as more survey responses arrive.
Information only, not investment advice.