Hakusan City Housing Market Report 2025
Data updated 2026-11-10 · Source: MLIT transaction price survey, 2005 Q3–2026 Q2
Key figures for 2025
- Median house price (land + building)
- ¥14.0M
- Residential land per m² (sales)
- ¥51k/m²
- +15.9% over 5 years
- Transactions in 2025
- 307
- #5 of 11 areas in Ishikawa by price per m²
What the data says
Prices are still rising, but more slowly
Growth has cooled to about 1.3% a year, down from 3% a year in the previous five years. This looks more like a maturing market than a turning point, and it gives buyers a bit more room to negotiate.
Outperforming Ishikawa
Per m², houses here are 16% above the Ishikawa average. The premium has grown from 2% ten years ago, so Hakusan City has been outperforming its surroundings.
Station distance barely matters
Houses 11–15 minutes from a station sell for similar or higher prices than those near one, which usually means buyers here drive or value quiet residential streets.
What a typical purchase costs
Half of all house sales last year were between ¥8.2M and ¥25.5M. Listings outside that range are either unusual properties or worth a closer look.
A shrinking population
The population fell 1.2% between 2020 and 2025 (−3.9% for the wider area). Moves in and out roughly balanced in 2025. Households still grew 3.9% as people live in smaller households, which supports demand for smaller homes even as the population shrinks.
Typical vacancy
8.1% of homes were empty in 2023 (15.6% for the wider area), and 5.3% were empty without being for rent, for sale or used as second homes. The level of abandoned homes is around the national norm.
Lower earthquake risk
The government's seismic model gives a 6% chance of shaking of intensity 6-lower or stronger in the next 30 years (7% for the wider area). This is low by Japanese standards, although no part of Japan is free of earthquake risk.
Official land prices are edging up
On the government's fixed benchmark sites, which are valued the same way every year, residential land prices changed +3% in the year to January 2026 and +13% over five years. Because these sites don't change, this is the cleanest measure of land value trends.
Some flood or landslide exposure
Of the official land-price benchmark sites here, which sit in typical neighbourhoods, 79% are inside the worst-case flood zone, 7% are in a landslide warning area. Most worst-case flood zones are shallow (under 0.5 m) at the edges, so depth matters as much as the share. Check the hazard map for any specific address before buying.
Living in Hakusan City: people, homes and risks
- Population 2025
- 109,063
- -1.2% since 2020
- Ishikawa: -3.9%
- Net moves in 2025
- -53
- -0.49 per 1,000 residents
- Ishikawa: -2.55
- Vacant homes (2023)
- 8.1%
- 5.3% empty and not for rent or sale
- Ishikawa: 15.6%
- Median rent (2023)
- ¥48k
- per month, all rented homes
- Ishikawa: ¥47k
- Strong earthquake risk
- 5.7%
- chance of shaking of intensity 6-lower or more within 30 years
- Ishikawa: 6.8%
- Official land price 2026
- ¥47k/m²
- +2.7% in a year · +12.8% in 5 years
- Ishikawa: ¥49k/m²
- Flood exposure
- 78.6%
- of 14 benchmark sites in a worst-case flood zone (0.0% 3 m or deeper)
- Ishikawa: 58.8%
- Landslide exposure
- 7.1%
- of 14 benchmark sites in a landslide warning area
- Ishikawa: 2.8%
Check flood, landslide and tsunami zones for a specific address on the government hazard map ↗
Sources: 2025 Census (preliminary), 2025 Internal Migration Report, 2023 Housing and Land Survey (Statistics Bureau of Japan); J-SHIS seismic hazard model (NIED, 2024); Land Price Publication (MLIT). Earthquake probability is measured at the municipal center.
Example sales in Hakusan City
Real transactions from the last four quarters, picked near the lower (20th percentile), middle and upper (80th percentile) price points. Locations are shown at district level, as published by MLIT.
Condo
¥1.7M
¥113k/m²
- Asahimachi
- Matto · 4 min walk
- 1K · 15 m²
- Built 1991 (34 yrs) · RC
¥2.9M
¥145k/m²
- Ainokimachi
- Matto · 1 min walk
- 1K · 20 m²
- Built 1993 (32 yrs) · RC
¥5.6M
¥124k/m²
- Yatsuyashincho
- Matto · 8 min walk
- 2LDK · 45 m²
- Built 1990 (35 yrs) · RC
House
¥7.3M
¥86k/m²
- Miyanagaichimachi
- Matto · 21 min walk
- Land 155 m² · floor 85 m²
- Built 1974 (52 yrs) · Wood
¥16.0M
¥128k/m²
- Kozumachi
- Shijima · 28 min walk
- Land 200 m² · floor 125 m²
- Built 1998 (28 yrs) · Wood
¥31.0M
¥344k/m²
- Chiyononishi
- Nishi Matto · 20 min walk
- Land 250 m² · floor 90 m²
- Built 2019 (6 yrs) · Wood
Show data table
| Year | House |
|---|---|
| 2007 | ¥17.0M |
| 2008 | ¥15.0M |
| 2009 | ¥14.0M |
| 2010 | ¥13.0M |
| 2011 | ¥16.0M |
| 2012 | ¥13.0M |
| 2013 | ¥14.0M |
| 2014 | ¥13.5M |
| 2015 | ¥15.0M |
| 2016 | ¥15.0M |
| 2017 | ¥13.0M |
| 2018 | ¥13.0M |
| 2019 | ¥14.0M |
| 2020 | ¥16.5M |
| 2021 | ¥19.0M |
| 2022 | ¥14.0M |
| 2023 | ¥20.0M |
| 2024 | ¥16.0M |
| 2025 | ¥14.0M |
| 2026 (partial) | ¥18.0M |
Show data table
| Year | House | Land |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | ¥144k/m² | ¥47k/m² |
| 2008 | ¥104k/m² | ¥51k/m² |
| 2009 | ¥100k/m² | ¥44k/m² |
| 2010 | ¥92k/m² | ¥38k/m² |
| 2011 | ¥100k/m² | ¥37k/m² |
| 2012 | ¥87k/m² | ¥33k/m² |
| 2013 | ¥95k/m² | ¥37k/m² |
| 2014 | ¥90k/m² | ¥32k/m² |
| 2015 | ¥103k/m² | ¥39k/m² |
| 2016 | ¥103k/m² | ¥36k/m² |
| 2017 | ¥92k/m² | ¥47k/m² |
| 2018 | ¥108k/m² | ¥40k/m² |
| 2019 | ¥89k/m² | ¥42k/m² |
| 2020 | ¥135k/m² | ¥44k/m² |
| 2021 | ¥119k/m² | ¥45k/m² |
| 2022 | ¥100k/m² | ¥49k/m² |
| 2023 | ¥145k/m² | ¥52k/m² |
| 2024 | ¥121k/m² | ¥50k/m² |
| 2025 | ¥119k/m² | ¥51k/m² |
| 2026 (partial) | ¥130k/m² | ¥54k/m² |
Show data table
| Building age (years) | House |
|---|---|
| 0 | ¥262k/m² |
| 1 | ¥305k/m² |
| 18 | ¥130k/m² |
| 25 | ¥72k/m² |
| 26 | ¥121k/m² |
| 28 | ¥104k/m² |
| 32 | ¥79k/m² |
| 33 | ¥93k/m² |
| 34 | ¥136k/m² |
| 35 | ¥82k/m² |
| 36 | ¥110k/m² |
| 39 | ¥79k/m² |
| 41 | ¥107k/m² |
| 43 | ¥62k/m² |
| 47 | ¥68k/m² |
| 48 | ¥71k/m² |
| 49 | ¥28k/m² |
| 50 | ¥35k/m² |
Each line follows buildings from one construction period over time. 1981 is when Japan's current earthquake-resistance standard (shin-taishin) took effect.
Show data table
| Year | 1971-1980 | 1981-2000 | 2011-2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | – | ¥111k/m² | – |
| 2009 | – | ¥79k/m² | – |
| 2010 | – | ¥101k/m² | – |
| 2011 | – | ¥102k/m² | – |
| 2012 | – | ¥91k/m² | – |
| 2013 | – | ¥94k/m² | – |
| 2014 | – | ¥90k/m² | – |
| 2015 | ¥50k/m² | ¥100k/m² | ¥217k/m² |
| 2016 | – | ¥88k/m² | ¥216k/m² |
| 2017 | ¥58k/m² | ¥85k/m² | ¥240k/m² |
| 2018 | ¥80k/m² | ¥92k/m² | ¥227k/m² |
| 2019 | ¥52k/m² | ¥82k/m² | ¥236k/m² |
| 2020 | – | ¥96k/m² | ¥244k/m² |
| 2021 | – | ¥87k/m² | – |
| 2022 | – | ¥92k/m² | – |
| 2023 | – | ¥111k/m² | – |
| 2024 | ¥52k/m² | ¥92k/m² | – |
| 2025 | – | ¥109k/m² | – |
| 2026 (partial) | – | ¥124k/m² | – |
Prices near train stations in Hakusan City
Sales from 2023–2025, grouped by nearest station.
| Station | Median used condo price | Condo price per m² | Median house price (land + building) | Walk (min) | Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matto (松任) | ¥3.5M | ¥120k/m² | ¥19.5M | 14 | 174 |
| Kaga Kasama (加賀笠間) | – | – | ¥15.0M | 18 | 52 |
| Mikawa(Ishikawa) (美川) | – | – | ¥10.0M | 13 | 30 |
| Tsurugi (鶴来) | – | – | ¥2.4M | 14 | 16 |
| Dohoji (道法寺) | – | – | ¥29.5M | 13 | 14 |
| Komaiko (小舞子) | – | – | ¥8.8M | 6 | 13 |
| Inokuchi(Ishikawa) (井口(石川)) | – | – | ¥11.0M | 16 | 11 |
| Nishi Matto (西松任) | – | – | ¥24.0M | 20 | 11 |
| Nonoichi(IR) (野々市(ＩＲ)) | – | – | ¥19.0M | 23 | 11 |
| Oyanagi(Ishikawa) (小柳(石川)) | – | – | ¥14.0M | 16 | 10 |
How much does a house cost in Hakusan City?
The median house sale, including the land, was ¥14.0M in 2025 across 119 sales.
Are property prices in Hakusan City going up?
Over the five years to 2025, residential land prices changed +15.9%.
About this data
Figures are medians of real transactions reported to Japan's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) through its quarterly price survey. House prices per m² divide the total price (land and building) by the floor area. Medians based on fewer than 20 sales are not shown. The latest quarters are preliminary and are revised as more survey responses arrive.
Information only, not investment advice.